Checking each submittal against the relevant specification clauses and drawings, flagging omissions and deviations, and drafting the review response with the source of every finding.

Extracting obligations, notice periods, risk allocations and deliverables from the executed contract into a structured register the project team can act on.

Checking architectural, structural and MEP sheets against each other for conflicts, missing references and inconsistent schedules before issue.

Checking the fire strategy report against the drawings, specifications and schedules it depends on, and surfacing contradictions before they reach the regulator or site.

Checking a higher-risk building application for contradictions and gaps across the fire strategy, structural and design information before submission to the regulator.

Turning the handover deliverables into a structured asset and information register, with every record linked to its source document and drawing.

Capturing decisions, defects, precedents and outcomes from completed projects into structured knowledge the next project can reuse.

Asking questions across the whole project record, drawings, models, specs, contracts and correspondence, and getting answers that cite their source.

Finding whether a question has been answered before, on this or earlier projects, and drafting the RFI or its response from the governing drawings and clauses.

Reconciling what the specification requires with what the drawings and schedules show, item by item, with every mismatch traced to its clause and sheet.

Reading the full tender pack within the tender window to surface scope, risk, contradictions and qualifications before pricing is committed.

Tracing a proposed change through the drawings, specification, programme and contract to identify what it touches and what it triggers.